What the eyes can't see 34

Ernest Heckle had a graduate student by the name of Eugene Dubois, who he instructed to find the missing link and he even told him where he would likely find it in Indonesia. This is how Homo erectus first came about. Dutch archaeologist Eugene Dubois went to Java Indonesia, Dubois himself actually did not find these fossils. He hired some ex-convicts who were out on parole to go out and do the digging. They found a skullcap of a gibbon and then the following year, fifty feet away in that same location, a human leg bone and some molar teeth. Before Dubois died he admitted publicly actually what he had discovered. Sadly you will find models, or reconstructions of most of these so called missing links in your local museums. American scientists, in the 1930's, so as not to be left out, from a single tooth reconstructed the Nebraska Man, it later turned out to actually be the tooth of an extinct pig.
In 1980 scientist Richard Leakey,(see here) strangely enough another evolutionist who vowed never to become a Christian, made this statement regarding footprints discovered by his mother in Kenya."These footprints are the best evidence we have of what our ancestors were like. And we can trace our lineage back to them."National Geographic sponsored an artist by the name of Jay Matterness to create an artwork to reconstruct what it looked like 3.75 million years ago. And here is the painting.
In the footprints that look like Guinea fowl, the artist painted Guinea fowl, exactly like Guinea fowl look today. In the footprints that look like giraffe footprints, he painted a giraffe, identical to a giraffe that you would see today. In the footprints that look like elephant footprints, well he painted a herd of elephants that look like elephants. In the rabbit footprint, the artist painted a rabbit, just like a modern rabbit. But in the footprints that are identical to ours (the same, with no difference) the artist painted two adult baboon, part-human like creatures without any clothes. One carrying a baby, the other a stick. There it is in the name of science. But is this science or is this an interpretation of the evidence that shows strong bias to support the evolutionary assumption?
1Tim 6:20 Timothy, guard what has been entrusted to your care. Turn away from godless chatter and the opposing ideas of what is falsely called knowledge.